Metric System - 150 Years in the United States

The metric system was officially recognized as a system of measurement that can be used in the United States on July 28, 1866 
"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the passage of this act it shall be lawful throughout the United States of America to employ the weights and measures of the metric system; and no contract or dealing, or pleading in any court, shall be deemed invalid or liable to objection because the weights or measures expressed or referred to therein are weights or measures of the metric system"

Can We Use Lightning as a Source of Energy?

Storing the energy from lightning sounds like a great solution to our energy crisis if it could be harnessed.  Lightning bolts carry from 5 kA to 200 kA and voltages vary from 40 kV to 120 kV. So on an average, a bolt generates 100 kA and 100 kV.  There are an average of 1.4 billion lightning strikes a year, but only ¼ of those strikes are ground strikes.  That means ¾ of the strikes are cloud to cloud strikes and cannot be harnessed.  That being said, there are still 350 million lightning strikes, or still about 490,000,000,000 kWh that we should be able to capture, transfer and store. Sounds like that would provide plenty of energy to power the world!  
     The problem is we do not have that technology in electrical energy storage, at this time in history, to harness the power.  But even if we did, that only boils down to providing enough electricity to power the world for 9 days.  We would have to build some kind of device big enough to get hit by enough lightning strikes to supply the desired energy. There would have to be towers erected about the height of the World Trade Center. To capture every lightning strike these very tall towers would have to be erected a mile apart in grid formation everywhere covering the entire globe!  That would be one tower for the 200,000,000 square miles of the surface of the earth!  The equipment needed to capture this much electrical energy in a strike would have be heavy conduction rods with ultra-heavy duty electrical circuits and storage super-capacitors so that it would be able to capture any of that power in that time period.  On top of that, there is the problem of financing such a massive project!  The cost for each tower and electrical circuitry storage would be around $500,000. That is about $100 Trillion for the land equipment. Then there would have to be flotation towers for the oceans. Plus, the installation costs and regular maintenance, and the wire grid connecting all the towers together, making it probably more money than we have in this world!  Add to that the impossibility for the entire world to agree on this concept and project… or agree on anything globally!
     Compare all that with the fact that one hour of sunlight has the same amount of energy that we use in a year! We have much more power available from the sun and we only need our rooftops to accumulate all we need. Especially with the advances and improvements being made with solar panel efficiency. Another major challenge to harvest energy from lightning is the impossibility of predicting when and where thunderstorms will occur. Statics show that lightning strikes on an average of once in 10 years to the same general place.  Even during a storm, it would be difficult to determine where exactly lightning will strike, but the sun shines continually!
(by Tim)
__________
References:

The Future of Electricity

Years ago, I was a pupil in the elementary school. At that time, the only electric thing that existed in my family was light bulbs. Those light bulbs were very similar to the one Tomas Edition had invented one hundred years ago. I thought those light bulbs were very useful to my family, but the television that was in my neighbor’s house was just an entertaining tool. Without light bulbs, we would light candles to bring us light in the house, and we could still live well. At the present, however, like many people, I totally have changed my point of view to the significance of the electricity, and regard electricity as a daily life necessity. Except light bulbs, people need many other kinds of equipment requiring electricity, such as: phones, computers, refrigerators, air-conditions and so on. Therefore, currently, electricity has already become a part of most people’s life. According to this fast pace of development, humans will relay on electricity much more in the future. What does the future electricity look like? Two significant parts I want to mention in this paper are electricity generation and electricity transmission. 
     
     In this modern technology era, electricity demand is constantly increasing with individuals and in society. There are different points of views toward the future of generating electricity. On the one hand, a majority of voices are positive about developing more renewable energies (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, biomass, etc.) in the near future (Islam, Hasanuzzaman, Rahim, Nahar, & Hosenuzzaman, 2014). For instance, M. A. Islam and his companions stated that renewable energy will ultimately fulfill 80% of total energy requirement in the end of this century even though natural gas will temporary play a main role in the coming two or three decades (Islam et al., 2014). Apparently coal, one of the fossil fuels will gradually decrease its role in the future due to its excessive carbon emissions. In addition, David Biello stated as well that renewable energy and natural gas may become main sources for electricity in the near future in the United States (Biello, 2010). On the other hand, renewable energy could not satisfy all of the future’s energy needs. Applying nuclear energy is a very debatable issue from decades ago until now. According to Alan McDonald (2008), nuclear energy will have a very different future in each particular country around the world regarding its own experience and perspective to nuclear power. In general, Asian countries, especially China and India, tend to build more nuclear power plants now and will continue in the future, since they need electricity in large quantities. In comparison, some developed European countries would decrease the use of nuclear power plants, and instead they will lay special stress on developing renewable energies. Obviously, each nation has its own plan to satisfy its particular electric demand. 

     Electricity transmission is another key element to the future of electricity. The current electricity transmission may waste electricity and have some security problems. However, smart grid systems are able to provide a more efficient transmission and cut down the potential safety hazards, such as environmental pollution due to the process of the electricity (Islam et al., 2014). Moreover, a smart gird is able to achieve more accurate date and analyses, more flexible managemen and mutual communication with customers. In the article, Islam and his partner writers suggested applying the smart grid system to the sustainable energy generation, and it will open a new page to meet both social and environmental needs in the future. 
     
     To conclude, there are more than one options to optimize the future of electricity. It could be choosing a better power resource, sustainable energy, or improving electric grid efficiency, which will be a good choice. Meanwhile, when we are trying to get power, we should be concerned about our planet, where it is not only our home but also our next generations’ living place. Besides the ideas I have mentioned above, I believe that humans have the ability to solve our electricity problems and ultimately meet our future needs. It even could be something else to substitute electricity at some future date.
(by XN)
_________________
References:

Salvaged/Recollections

 
Photos: Mary Pat Wager exhibit at St. Bonaventure University, Olean, NY.

Kirchhoff's Loops and Junctions

The blue loop: V1 + V5 + V3 = 0
The purple loop: V2 + V5 + V4 = 0
The green loop: V1 + V2 + V4 + V3 = 0
 
The orange junction: I1 + I2 + I5 = 0
The green junction:  I3 + I4 + I5 = 0 

Resistors in series

There are three resistors in series: 1st 330 ohm, 2nd 100 ohm, and 3rd 1,000 ohm.  
 
The first two resistors add to 430 ohm (the reading: 428 ohm, 0.5% difference).

The second and the third one add to 1100 ohm (the reading: 1097 ohm, 0.3% difference).

 All three resistors add to 1430 ohm (the reading: 1424 ohm, 0.4% difference).

Resistors combined in series and parallel

 
Two 10 ohm resistors in parallel are combined with the third 10 ohm resistor is series. The calculated total resistance of the combination is 15 ohm (two 10 ohm resistors in parallel = 5 ohm, plus 10 ohm in series). The measured total resistance is 14.8 ohm and 15.2 ohm; in both cases the measurement error is about 1%.

Resistors in parallel

 
There are 10 ohm resistors in parallel. The equivalent resistance for two 10 ohm resistors in parallel is 5 ohm. The measured value, as shown in the picture, is 4.98 ohm (percent error of 4%).
 
The equivalent resistance for three 10 ohm resistors is 3.3 ohm. The measured value (see the photograph) is 3.5 ohm (percent error of 5%).

Resistors in series

There are three 10 ohm resistors connected in series. 
 
The equivalent resistance of two 10 ohm resistors is 10 ohm + 10 ohm = 20 ohm. The first measurement error is 0.5%, while the second one shows the exact expected value.
The equivalent resistance of three ohm resistors is 10 ohm + 10 ohm + 10 ohm = 30 ohm. The measured resistance of these three resistors is 29.8 ohm; the percent error 0.67%